Discuter:Révoltes et utopies : la contre-culture américaine des années soixante

Un article de Wiki Agreg-Ink.

(Différences entre les versions)
Jump to: navigation, search
Version du 25 avril 2011 à 10:04
Sashi (Discuter | contribs)

← Différence précédente
Version du 25 avril 2011 à 10:04
Sashi (Discuter | contribs)

Différence suivante →
Ligne 3: Ligne 3:
#I have left those contributions I marked up for others, from the thread dedicated to this topic on the forum. #I have left those contributions I marked up for others, from the thread dedicated to this topic on the forum.
#I will store my contribution elsewhere for the administration team's comfort (discussions with the user in question having proven futile, I am seeking to avoid conflict), and obviously for reasons of editorial control.<br /> #I will store my contribution elsewhere for the administration team's comfort (discussions with the user in question having proven futile, I am seeking to avoid conflict), and obviously for reasons of editorial control.<br />
-#<span style="color:green">Sometimes, you just have to think (''or be allowed to think'') outside of the box.</span> [http://www.slate.fr/story/36863/jeunes-france-etats-unis-ambition-pessimisme on encouraging innovation]+#<span style="color:green">Sometimes, you just have to think (''or be allowed to think'') outside of the box.</span>: [http://www.slate.fr/story/36863/jeunes-france-etats-unis-ambition-pessimisme article on encouraging innovation]

Version du 25 avril 2011 à 10:04

  1. I have decided to take my contribution down, as it did not please one of the users here at agreg-ink, a user who it turns out is not listed as an admin.
  2. It is healthy that information on "counterculture" should rattle a wannabe admin's cage.
  3. I have left those contributions I marked up for others, from the thread dedicated to this topic on the forum.
  4. I will store my contribution elsewhere for the administration team's comfort (discussions with the user in question having proven futile, I am seeking to avoid conflict), and obviously for reasons of editorial control.
  5. Sometimes, you just have to think (or be allowed to think) outside of the box.: article on encouraging innovation