|
DIDACTIQUE FORMELLE :
L'ANGLAIS AU LYCEE par Estelle Bossonney et Maxime Lachèze
(Guide Belin de l'enseignement)
Entre théorie et pratique,
rédigé à l'aune des dernières Instructions Officielles
pour le lycée. Se veut clair, précis , fourni de nombreux exemples
de mises en oeuvre ( exique, vidéo, décodage et production de l'écrit
et de l'oral, grammaire de l'énonciation, TIC...
- Col, d'à Sète, Juillet 2002.
LES BIBLES
Aux Laboratoires ELLIPSES
: 32 rue Bargue, 750015
PARIS :
- par MM. Puren, Bertocchini &
Costanzo :
'Se former en didactique des
langues'
- par Dames Claire TARDIEU et
Mireille QUIVY:
- 'Réussir l'épreuve
sur dossier au CAPES'.
- 'Réussir l'épreuve
de didactique à l'agrégation interne d'anglais', petit (sic) manuel à l'usage des enseignants de lycée,
janvier 99, 110 F. Recommandé.
UNE OPINION DE CANDIDAT:
> Les
dossiers sont costauds, ambitieux - analyses littéraires, dossier type classe
d'hypokhâgne... Mais leur diversité permet d'approcher une méthode
à suivre pour les candidats qui ont fait le tour des rapp de jury, les dossiers cned n'étant pas non
plus du goût de tous...
En fin de livre on trouve des fiches - pas très claires, ultra synthétiques
- sur l'argumentation..., mais aussi celles, plus aguichantes, sur la PRL, la phonologie,
le débat, les exercices et activités...
Vu qu'à l'oral et à l'écrit les consignes des activités
et exercices sont à formuler en anglais, une autre fiche propose des consignes
par thèmes : grammar, comprehension, vocabulary, rhythm and sounds...
Utile récapitulation donc, où l'on croisera plusieurs fois la consigne
pick up the words,
par ailleurs villipendée
dans un rapport de jury... CJ.
BIO:
Dame Quivy est Prof agrégée
à Univ Rouen, membre du jury (mais pour l'épreuve universitaire) à
l'agreg interne, formatrice en didactique et linguistique pour l'agrég interne
à Aca Rouen. Dame Tardieu est Maître de conférences à
IUFM Haute-Normandie, et chargée de cours pour l'agrég interne à
l'institut d'anglais Charles V.
> If you want to know what Dame Quivy is up to, there's a new course
book for 2des "Moving on" by her chez Hatier. I must say the Quivy &
Tardieu was really helpful for me to get an idea of what the concours was about (I
got 5.5 last year and 6.5 this year at the written didatique paper) especially for
people like me who have no chance to go to any university prep... F.
AVIS DE déjà-grégés
:
> Needless
to say the best preparation I got last year was found in no book but simply was the
mock exams we took during the training classes we got in my académie.
The important thing is to get as much practice as you can in real time in front of
your peers if possible (ask some of your closest colleagues) so as to get that feedback
which is so essential to any progress in speech delivery (see the site for interesting
web links).
Try to do it as soon as November (we all know the admissibilité results come
far too late to start getting some efficient practiceat that point.
Quite honestly, I dare say the book might not be worth the money , considering that
in order to get a good idea of what you ideally need to do, you don't need to read
more than one or two didactic sequences ; that is if you don't want to be completely
knocked out by all that peda(go)ntic vocab.
And since my oral exam when I got the very clear impression that the jurys did not
expect a didactic preparation that was so far from our class realities as I had thought
they did (almost all questions I was asked were about the way I planned activities
concretely in class...),
I have come to the conclusion that the book was a tiny bit too "spacey"
for me, that is "flying up into much higher spheres than even our small-but-already-quite-high-above-little-earthly-class-realities
agrégation !
-N., agrégée, interne 2001.
> First, get to understand the expectations
of the jury, then on with studying some "dossiers" on your own, then in
front of your peers.
As for the book, it is full of ideas, but I found the "dossiers" rather
difficult. There are 5 "dossiers intégraux" and seven ones with
"séances phares" (lighthouse sittings? luminous lessons ? beacon
classes ?) so that could be a bit out of date, made for an ex-exam... Still, the
"spirit" is there...
But is it still worth 110 FF ? The "Glossaire de didactique de l'anglais"
is not bad either, especially if you would like to start from scratch.
But it doesn't give you the practice you need.
My advice would be to try to do as many "dossiers" as possible.
- JC, agrégé, interne 2001.
|
Apache top
tips